We love clichés around Absolute Horror – and what could be more clichéd than a film centered around teenagers camping out in the woods and getting killed one by one? So it was with giddy anticipation that I sat down to watch ADAM & EVIL, another variant on this same thing. How sad I was at the failure of this film to get even the basics right. Now, it’s not brain surgery. Making an entertaining film about teenagers getting whacked isn’t that hard to do. So, in a sense, it’s almost more of an achievement that ADAM & EVIL failed so spectacularly. But I’m still not giving it a good rating.
Continue reading "ADAM & EVIL" »
When Francis Ford Coppola released BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA – there was good reason for putting Bram’s name in the title. Although there was plenty of artistic license taken in that film, it largely stayed true to the original story. Soon a whole industry of low budget movies only tangentially related to Bram Stoker's stories emerged, yet somehow they were able to put his name in the title. Case in point: BRAM STOKER’S THE MUMMY, a humorously bad adaptation of Stoker’s “Jewel of the Seven Stars.” Now, I can’t speak to the book, because I haven’t read it – but I have read other work by Stoker and they tended to be of high quality. Which is why I suspect this film had little to do with the source material.
Continue reading "BRAM STOKER'S THE MUMMY" »
What the hell just happened? I awoke from the mystifying daze known as ALIEN 51 with that question on my mind. I have seen more terrible horror movies than your average Joe, but this was just so unfathomably unwatchable that I almost considered hanging up my DVDs and riding into the sunset. Still, I had to give it a shot – if only to see Heidi Fleiss in her first major acting role. If it’s not her last major acting role, then please stick a spike in my eye right now because I don’t want to see anymore.
Continue reading "ALIEN 51" »
A masterpiece. Simply a work of art. NIGHT OF THE CREEPS might just be one of the cheesiest, most entertaining horror films ever made. This is why I got into the bad horror movie reviewing business. NIGHT OF THE CREEPS is the gold standard by which all other bad horror films should be measured. Rent it. Love it. Live it.
Continue reading "NIGHT OF THE CREEPS" »
Look,
I don’t mean to dispute Wes Craven’s credentials as horror king. Early in his career he pulled off LAST HOUSE
ON THE LEFT and THE HILLS HAVE EYES. Not long after came A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET. But it dropped off pretty fast from there, with one lame effort
after another – from the misbegotten sequel to HILLS to the inexcusable
SHOCKER. Then, Wes read a story about
a California couple who kept their children locked in the basement and decided
to write THE PEOPLE UNDER THE STAIRS. To be fair, anyone would have a tough time coming up with a full-length
feature film based on that one concept. But Wes Craven, despite a fair amount of tripe in his career, is a pro
so maybe he could pull it off. Wishful
thinking.
Continue reading "THE PEOPLE UNDER THE STAIRS" »
How could they? What happened? What in the process of making TOBE HOOPER'S NIGHT TERRORS went so utterly wrong? How could this movie be so incredibly poor? I was attracted towards this movie by its elegant cover, by the fact that Robert Englund (Freddy Kreuger) was in it, and finally that it was directed by Tobe Hooper, the man behind the first two TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRES movies and POLTERGEIST. Sure, every good director has bad movies, but this movie is so far below bad, so incredibly shoddy, so mind-numbingly awful, that it defies comprehension.
Continue reading "NIGHT TERRORS (aka TOBE HOOPER'S NIGHT TERRORS)" »
I don’t get it. Why mess with a classic? For whatever reason, George Romero agreed to remake his 1968 masterpiece in 1990 – and went so far as to write the screenplay for this movie. He got some great people involved, including director and make-up master extraordinaire Tom Savini. But still, what’s the point? Remakes are one thing, but if you’re going to do it I think you need to depart enough from the original to make it your own (see DAWN OF THE DEAD and its remake). Instead, Romero and Savini decide to stick very close to the original, with a few key changes. The problem is, these changes aren’t enough to erase the memory that you’re essentially watching a poor imitation.
Continue reading "NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1990)" »
We here at Absolute Horror are used to plots that are essentially incomprehensible. But rarely are they literally incomprehensible, as was the case with SCARECROWS. Which isn’t to say it’s all bad, just that there were many moments I quite literally had no idea what was happening. Moreover, there were plenty of times I would hear dialogue and not know who was speaking it. It was like watching a Terrence Mallick film gone horribly, horribly wrong. Yet, despite it all, this low, low-budget scare flick actually manages to deliver some thrills.
Continue reading "SCARECROWS" »
I saw the preview for THE PAPERBOY while watching an old John Woo movie I rented (yes, I do sometimes watch non-horror movies). Upon seeing the preview, I thought to myself, “This is going to be classic, you have to rent it.” So, next time I got a chance I rented THE PAPERBOY with the hopes that it would be a silly little movie about a psycho paperboy who delivered death with his papers. With those expectations, I was disappointed. THE PAPERBOY, however, isn't a terrible movie. It's not necessarily that enjoyable, either, but the concept of the movie is actually quite disturbing and got under my skin more than I suspected it would.
Continue reading "THE PAPERBOY" »