A few years ago I was
sitting around in the dark with a friend telling ghost stories. Some of the best come from haunted house
movies, so I immediately launched into stories from some classics like THE
INNOCENTS or THE HAUNTING (the original). My friend brought up a couple tales from
BURNT OFFERINGS, tales I found intriguing. So when I saw BURNT OFFERINGS coming up on
cable, I immediately TiVo’d it. The end
result was an occasionally chilling, but mostly silly movie that could have
been so much more.
I love, love, love
haunted house movies. One of my biggest
regrets in life is how few good ones exist. Why is this? Perhaps because most movies fail to have a good answer to one simple
question: “If the house is clearly haunted, then why stay?” THE INNOCENTS and THE HAUNTING, for instance,
both have perfectly reasonable explanations. THE AMITYVILLE HORROR and countless others
never do. BURNT OFFERINGS unfortunately
never does either. A shame really,
because the potential was there.
Karen Black and
Oliver Reed play a married couple who, along with their son, find a grand old
house in the country to rent for the summer. They should have run away screaming when crazy
Burgess Meredith rolls in on a wheelchair grinning at them like a starving man
eyeing a ham sandwich. Or the fact that
it costs only $900 to take the place for the summer. Nevertheless, they jump for the deal and
before we know it they spruce the place up. Hmm, a couple with a son in a secluded house – sounds a bit like THE
SHINING doesn’t it? The only difference
is this couple brings along Reed’s aunt, Bette Davis, who adds a lot more star
power to the movie than it deserves.
Of course, the
place is haunted, and as the movie goes on we are let in on this secret with a
few hints: Reed goes nuts one day and almost strangles his son in the pool; an
old lady (we think) is hidden away in a room and never opens her door; a
variety of creepy old photos populate the place; Reed starts getting nightmares
about a hearse and its freakish driver; Black starts to get amazed by how the
house seems to clean itself up; and on and on. Therein is a bit of the problem. BURNT OFFERINGS is looooong. Two
full hours of walking around, opening doors, not opening doors, etc etc. Where’s the payoff?
I suppose the
payoff is the end, which has a nice twist – I think. It’s not entirely clear what the whole thing
is about. What is clear is that Karen
Black overacts in all her cross-eyed glory, while Oliver Reed, normally no
stranger to overacting, actually does an excellent job in the lead. The movie certainly has its goose-bump
producing moments, but what it needs is serious editing to clarify the story and
move things along with a quicker pace. And
it needs an answer to the question, “If the house is haunted, then why stay?” Without these things, it’s another sad
what-could-have-been entry into the haunted house genre.
RATING: ** (out of
four)
I was in low spirits before,but now i read your writting,i feel a little better!
Posted by: Cheap Bikinis | July 12, 2011 at 05:36 AM
Your article swept me away with its vast information and great writing. Thank you for sharing your views with such passion. I like your views.
Posted by: Nike Free | July 12, 2011 at 05:39 AM
Only an injunction)0f the lessening Can avoid that problem. Defendant: 1)Our name accurately reflected the first BaFfle of the owner of the store.andwe used the word“secret”as a kind of inside ioke because we wanted to keep the new business a secret from a former boss at a competing store.
Posted by: Lacoste Trainers | July 12, 2011 at 05:43 AM